On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 05:44:11PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
On 8/18/2021 11:16 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
Lock the xarray and take ref to the context if needed.
v2: (Checkpatch)
- Add new line after declaration
(Daniel Vetter)
- Correct put / get accounting in xa_for_loops
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost matthew.brost@intel.com
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 103 +++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c index 509b298e7cf3..5f77f25322ca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c @@ -606,8 +606,18 @@ static void scrub_guc_desc_for_outstanding_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc) unsigned long index, flags; bool pending_disable, pending_enable, deregister, destroyed, banned;
- xa_lock_irqsave(&guc->context_lookup, flags); xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
/*
* Corner case where the ref count on the object is zero but and
* deregister G2H was lost. In this case we don't touch the ref
* count and finish the destroy of the context.
*/
bool do_put = kref_get_unless_zero(&ce->ref);
xa_unlock(&guc->context_lookup);
/*spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
- Once we are at this point submission_disabled() is guaranteed
@@ -623,7 +633,9 @@ static void scrub_guc_desc_for_outstanding_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc) banned = context_banned(ce); init_sched_state(ce);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
if (pending_enable || destroyed || deregister) { decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc);GEM_BUG_ON(!do_put && !destroyed);
@@ -646,13 +658,19 @@ static void scrub_guc_desc_for_outstanding_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc) } intel_context_sched_disable_unpin(ce); decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc);
spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock); guc_blocked_fence_complete(ce);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
}spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock); intel_context_put(ce);
if (do_put)
intel_context_put(ce);
is it safe to do the put outside the xa_lock, in case the refcount goes to zero with this? I know it is unlikely because the refcount was > 0 if do_put is true, but it might've gone down between us checking earlier and now.
It is safe as xa_for_each indicates it is safe to destroy / delete objects from the array while traversing it.
}xa_lock(&guc->context_lookup);
- xa_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->context_lookup, flags); } static inline bool
@@ -873,16 +891,29 @@ void intel_guc_submission_reset(struct intel_guc *guc, bool stalled) { struct intel_context *ce; unsigned long index;
- unsigned long flags; if (unlikely(!guc_submission_initialized(guc))) { /* Reset called during driver load? GuC not yet initialised! */ return; }
- xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce)
- xa_lock_irqsave(&guc->context_lookup, flags);
- xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce) {
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&ce->ref))
continue;
xa_unlock(&guc->context_lookup);
- if (intel_context_is_pinned(ce)) __guc_reset_context(ce, stalled);
intel_context_put(ce);
xa_lock(&guc->context_lookup);
- }
- xa_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->context_lookup, flags);
- /* GuC is blown away, drop all references to contexts */ xa_destroy(&guc->context_lookup); }
@@ -957,11 +988,24 @@ void intel_guc_submission_cancel_requests(struct intel_guc *guc) { struct intel_context *ce; unsigned long index;
- unsigned long flags;
- xa_lock_irqsave(&guc->context_lookup, flags);
- xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce) {
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&ce->ref))
continue;
xa_unlock(&guc->context_lookup);
- xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce) if (intel_context_is_pinned(ce)) guc_cancel_context_requests(ce);
intel_context_put(ce);
xa_lock(&guc->context_lookup);
- }
- xa_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->context_lookup, flags);
- guc_cancel_sched_engine_requests(guc->sched_engine); /* GuC is blown away, drop all references to contexts */
@@ -2850,21 +2894,28 @@ void intel_guc_find_hung_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) struct intel_context *ce; struct i915_request *rq; unsigned long index;
- unsigned long flags; /* Reset called during driver load? GuC not yet initialised! */ if (unlikely(!guc_submission_initialized(guc))) return;
- xa_lock_irqsave(&guc->context_lookup, flags); xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce) {
if (!intel_context_is_pinned(ce))
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&ce->ref)) continue;
xa_unlock(&guc->context_lookup);
if (!intel_context_is_pinned(ce))
goto next;
- if (intel_engine_is_virtual(ce->engine)) { if (!(ce->engine->mask & engine->mask))
continue;
} else { if (ce->engine != engine)goto next;
continue;
} list_for_each_entry(rq, &ce->guc_active.requests, sched.link) {goto next;
@@ -2874,9 +2925,17 @@ void intel_guc_find_hung_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) intel_engine_set_hung_context(engine, ce); /* Can only cope with one hang at a time... */
return;
intel_context_put(ce);
xa_lock(&guc->context_lookup);
}goto done;
+next:
intel_context_put(ce);
xa_lock(&guc->context_lookup);
nit: extra newline
Checkpatch got that one too. Already fixed.
Matt
Daniele
} +done:
- xa_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->context_lookup, flags); } void intel_guc_dump_active_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
@@ -2892,23 +2951,34 @@ void intel_guc_dump_active_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, if (unlikely(!guc_submission_initialized(guc))) return;
- xa_lock_irqsave(&guc->context_lookup, flags); xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce) {
if (!intel_context_is_pinned(ce))
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&ce->ref)) continue;
xa_unlock(&guc->context_lookup);
if (!intel_context_is_pinned(ce))
goto next;
- if (intel_engine_is_virtual(ce->engine)) { if (!(ce->engine->mask & engine->mask))
continue;
} else { if (ce->engine != engine)goto next;
continue;
}goto next;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_active.lock, flags);
intel_engine_dump_active_requests(&ce->guc_active.requests, hung_rq, m);spin_lock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_active.lock, flags);
spin_unlock(&ce->guc_active.lock);
+next:
intel_context_put(ce);
}xa_lock(&guc->context_lookup);
- xa_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->context_lookup, flags); } void intel_guc_submission_print_info(struct intel_guc *guc,
@@ -2962,7 +3032,9 @@ void intel_guc_submission_print_context_info(struct intel_guc *guc, { struct intel_context *ce; unsigned long index;
- unsigned long flags;
- xa_lock_irqsave(&guc->context_lookup, flags); xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce) { drm_printf(p, "GuC lrc descriptor %u:\n", ce->guc_id); drm_printf(p, "\tHW Context Desc: 0x%08x\n", ce->lrc.lrca);
@@ -2981,6 +3053,7 @@ void intel_guc_submission_print_context_info(struct intel_guc *guc, guc_log_context_priority(p, ce); }
- xa_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->context_lookup, flags); } static struct intel_context *