On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:24:50PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:13 PM Robert Foss robert.foss@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 16:01, Robert Foss robert.foss@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 10:49, Xin Ji xji@analogixsemi.com wrote:
As V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_PARALLEL not properly descript for DPI interface, this patch use new defined V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_DPI for it.
Fixes: fd0310b6fe7d ("drm/bridge: anx7625: add MIPI DPI input feature") Signed-off-by: Xin Ji xji@analogixsemi.com
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c index 376da01243a3..71df977e8f53 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c @@ -1623,14 +1623,14 @@ static int anx7625_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
anx7625_get_swing_setting(dev, pdata);
pdata->is_dpi = 1; /* default dpi mode */
pdata->is_dpi = 0; /* default dsi mode */ pdata->mipi_host_node = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, 0, 0); if (!pdata->mipi_host_node) { DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "fail to get internal panel.\n"); return -ENODEV; }
bus_type = V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_PARALLEL;
bus_type = 0; mipi_lanes = MAX_LANES_SUPPORT; ep0 = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(np, 0, 0); if (ep0) {@@ -1640,8 +1640,8 @@ static int anx7625_parse_dt(struct device *dev, mipi_lanes = of_property_count_u32_elems(ep0, "data-lanes"); }
if (bus_type == V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_PARALLEL) /* bus type is Parallel(DSI) */pdata->is_dpi = 0;
if (bus_type == V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_DPI) /* bus type is DPI */pdata->is_dpi = 1; pdata->mipi_lanes = mipi_lanes; if (pdata->mipi_lanes > MAX_LANES_SUPPORT || pdata->mipi_lanes <= 0)Reviewed-by: Robert Foss robert.foss@linaro.org
Acked-by: Robert Foss robert.foss@linaro.org
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai wenst@chromium.org
Confirmed this fixes the display on Juniper (Acer Chromebook Spin 311) on mainline (next-20220422).
Xin, in the future, please send the whole series to all recipients of all patches listed by get_maintainers.pl, not just the recipients of each patch. In the case of this series, they should have been sent to all of the mailing lists (media, devicetree, dri-devel) so that everyone has the same, full view of the patches.
Hi ChenYu, OK, I'll send to all media, devicetree, dri-devel next time. Thanks, Xin
ChenYu