Power domain fits much better than a voltage regulator in regards to a proper hardware description and from a software perspective as well. Hence replace the core regulator with the power domain. Note that this doesn't affect any existing DTBs because we haven't started to use the regulator yet, and thus, it's okay to change it.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko digetx@gmail.com --- .../bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml index 09bde65e1955..2ab42b05e198 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ properties: description: phandle of the memory controller node
- core-supply: + power-domains: description: - Phandle of voltage regulator of the SoC "core" power domain. + Phandle to the SoC "core" power domain.
operating-points-v2: description: @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ examples:
nvidia,memory-controller = <&mc>; operating-points-v2 = <&dvfs_opp_table>; - core-supply = <&vdd_core>; + power-domains = <&domain>;
#interconnect-cells = <0>;