Regards
Shashank
On 12/12/2018 2:08 AM, Uma Shankar wrote:
Add bit field and macro for extended tag in CEA block. Also, declare macros for HDR metadata block.
This should have been a part of patch, where these macros are being used, so that we can see it being used properly. While re-basing can you please merge ?
v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar uma.shankar@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c index b506e36..106fd38 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c @@ -2843,6 +2843,22 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, #define EDID_CEA_YCRCB422 (1 << 4) #define EDID_CEA_VCDB_QS (1 << 6)
+#define DATA_BLOCK_EXTENDED_TAG 0x07
Alignment should be one tab back, also I think we already have added extended tag macro (for parsing YCBCR420 blocks)
+#define VIDEO_CAPABILITY_DATA_BLOCK 0x0 +#define VSVD_DATA_BLOCK 0x1
Alignment one tab back
+#define COLORIMETRY_DATA_BLOCK 0x5 +#define HDR_STATIC_METADATA_BLOCK 0x6
+/* HDR Metadata Block: Bit fields */ +#define SUPPORTED_EOTF_MASK 0x3f +#define TRADITIONAL_GAMMA_SDR (0x1 << 0) +#define TRADITIONAL_GAMMA_HDR (0x1 << 1) +#define SMPTE_ST2084 (0x1 << 2) +#define FUTURE_EOTF (0x1 << 3)
why not properly call it HLG if we are adding a bit for it already ?
+#define RESERVED_EOTF (0x3 << 4)
+#define STATIC_METADATA_TYPE1 (0x1 << 0)
- /*
*/
- Search EDID for CEA extension block.
- Shashank