2014-09-09 Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:43:20AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
From: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk
Factor out a piece of code from intel_pipe_set_base() that updates the pipe size and adjust fitter.
This will help refactor the update primary plane path.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 2ccf7c0..e7e7184 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -2779,6 +2779,46 @@ static bool intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc) return pending; }
+static void intel_update_pipe_size(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
These days we usually prefer to pass intel_crtc instead of drm_crtc. You can still call it 'crtc' since that's shorter and because we don't need anything from drm_crtc in this function there won't be any confusion between the two.
Actually we need the drm_crtc 3 times in this function, that is why I left it as an argument. We could just do the other way around and get it from &intel_crtc->base.
Gustavo