23 Jan
2021
23 Jan
'21
11:46 a.m.
Den 21.01.2021 11.20, skrev Simon Ser:
On Thursday, January 21st, 2021 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de wrote:
Well, I'd strongly ask to not call it "generic", because it isn't. We have other USB drivers and anyone can make a USB display with these protocols as well. That doesn't make them generic. A USB-standardized protocol would be generic. Maybe call it custom, or home-made.
I agree that Generic probably isn't the best term to use here. Naming stuff is hard. Maybe: Open USB Display Protocol - oudp?
Maybe rename it to "GUD USB Display driver"? :P
Oh that's a recursive acronym :-) That would save me all the work of renaming. I think I'll go with that, thanks.
Noralf.