Building ramnve0.o triggers a GCC warning on 32 bits x86: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c: In function 'nve0_ram_ctor': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c:1253:1: warning: the frame size of 1496 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
This warning is caused by ramfuc_reg(), which is inlined 74 times in nve0_ram_ctor(). Mark it noinline to silence this warning.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebolle@tiscali.nl --- Compile tested (on 32 bits x86) only. I've no Nvidia cards at hand, so I can't really test it.
This assumes this function - a constructor, apparently - isn't called often, so the overhead calling of 74 functions is acceptable. (The same goes for the similar functions in [...]/ramnva3.c and in [...]/ramnvc0.c, though these call ramfuc_reg() not quite as often.) Perhaps there are other downsides to not inlining this function too. So proper testing will probably be needed.
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h index 0f57fcf..04e3849 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ramfuc_reg2(u32 addr1, u32 addr2) }; }
-static inline struct ramfuc_reg +static noinline struct ramfuc_reg ramfuc_reg(u32 addr) { return ramfuc_reg2(addr, addr);