Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the reviews.
On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 14:31 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 22/04/2022 04:32, Jason-JH Lin wrote:
Hi CK,
Thanks for the reviews.
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 14:50 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
Hi, Jason:
On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 17:41 +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
Add mtk-mutex support for mt8195 vdosys0.
Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Tested-by: Fei Shao fshao@chromium.org
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c index aaf8fc1abb43..729ee88035ed 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ #define MT8183_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30 #define MT8183_MUTEX0_SOF0 0x2c
+#define MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30 +#define MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF 0x2c
This is identical to mt8183, so use mt8183 one instead of creating new one.
Regards, CK
I'll fix this in the next version.
Please send this as a follow-up fix on top of:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/...
Regards, Matthias
OK, I'll send the fix-up patch soon.
Regards, Jason-JH.Lin
Regards, Jason-JH.Lin.
+static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt8195_mutex_driver_data = {
- .mutex_mod = mt8195_mutex_mod,
- .mutex_sof = mt8195_mutex_sof,
- .mutex_mod_reg = MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0,
- .mutex_sof_reg = MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF,
+};