On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:43:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 02:34:23PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:21:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
We have already few similar implementation and a lot of code that can benefit of the yesno() helper. Consolidate yesno() helpers under string.h hood.
I was taking a look on i915_utils.h to reduce it and move some of it elsewhere to be shared with others. I was starting with these helpers and had [1] done, then Jani pointed me to this thread and also his previous tentative. I thought the natural place for this would be include/linux/string_helpers.h, but I will leave it up to you.
Seems reasonable to use string_helpers (headers and/or C-file).
After reading the threads, I don't see real opposition to it. Is there a tree you plan to take this through?
I rest my series in favour of Jani's approach, so I suppose there is no go for _this_ series.
If you want to make it happen, please pick it up and drive it. I'm thoroughly had enough of this.
My point is still the same, so it's more to Lucas.
I'm not going to drive this activity due to lack of time.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211005212634.3223113-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.c...