Hey Dafna,
Thanks a lot for reviewing this.
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 12:21 +0300, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
Hi,
On 24.06.21 21:26, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
From: Paul Kocialkowski paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com
The Rockchip PX30 SoC has a Hantro VPU that features a decoder (VDPU2) and an encoder (VEPU2).
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel@collabora.com
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml index b88172a59de7..3b9c5aa91fcc 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ properties: - items: - const: rockchip,rk3228-vpu - const: rockchip,rk3399-vpu + - items: + - const: rockchip,px30-vpu + - const: rockchip,rk3399-vpu
This rk3399 compatible is already mentioned in the last 'items' list, should we add it again?
What we are mandating here is that "rockchip,px30-vpu" can only be used with "rockchip,rk3399-vpu".
I.e.:
compatible = "rockchip,px30-vpu", "rockchip,rk3399-vpu";