On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:54 AM Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com wrote:
Op 28-08-18 om 03:52 schreef Rob Herring:
In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
Cc: Gustavo Padovan gustavo@padovan.org Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: Sean Paul sean@poorly.run Cc: David Airlie airlied@linux.ie Cc: Rob Clark robdclark@gmail.com Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c index 02db9ac82d7a..24a750436559 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c @@ -716,8 +716,8 @@ int of_get_drm_display_mode(struct device_node *np, if (bus_flags) drm_bus_flags_from_videomode(&vm, bus_flags);
pr_debug("%pOF: got %dx%d display mode from %s\n",np, vm.hactive, vm.vactive, np->name);
pr_debug("%pOF: got %dx%d display mode\n",np, vm.hactive, vm.vactive);Aren't you removing it here instead of converting?
Well, yes. The full path and name are already printed so the node name alone was pretty redundant.
Rob