The bits for rotation are not used as exclusively. So GSC_IN_ROT_270 can not be used for swap detection. The definition of it is same with GSC_IN_ROT_MASK. It is enough to check GSC_IN_ROT_90 bit is set or not to check whether width / height size swapping is needed.
Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang human.hwang@samsung.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c index 8040ed2..f1c6b76 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c @@ -593,8 +593,7 @@ static int gsc_src_set_transf(struct device *dev,
gsc_write(cfg, GSC_IN_CON);
- ctx->rotation = cfg & - (GSC_IN_ROT_90 | GSC_IN_ROT_270) ? 1 : 0; + ctx->rotation = (cfg & GSC_IN_ROT_90) ? 1 : 0; *swap = ctx->rotation;
return 0; @@ -857,8 +856,7 @@ static int gsc_dst_set_transf(struct device *dev,
gsc_write(cfg, GSC_IN_CON);
- ctx->rotation = cfg & - (GSC_IN_ROT_90 | GSC_IN_ROT_270) ? 1 : 0; + ctx->rotation = (cfg & GSC_IN_ROT_90) ? 1 : 0; *swap = ctx->rotation;
return 0;