Hi Chanwoo, Archit,
On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
On 2018년 03월 07일 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Rob and Andrzej,
On 2018년 03월 06일 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof,
On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for reviews of previous iterations.
This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with working example. I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading to a happy end :)
v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function. v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts. v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C example. v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks
Changes in datail are described in the patches.
Regards Andrzej
Andrzej Hajda (5): dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node
Maciej Purski (1): drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL
It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's acks for dts part). Now I have a question how to merge them. The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st. I can merge it:
- All patches via drm-misc tree.
- All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via
samsung-soc tree.
Is it OK, for all? Better ideas?
Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on v4.16-rc1 and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to Rob and Andrzej.
I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull request. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=ib...
Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me.
It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch.
Beside it I am OK with your immutable branch, Archit is it OK to do it this way in drm-misc?
Regards
Andrzej