On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 12:12 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
This check is useful for drivers that do not have DRIVER_ATOMIC set but have atomic modesetting internally implemented. Wrap the check into a function since this is used in many places and as a bonus, the function name helps to document what the check is for.
v2: Change return type to bool (Ville) Move the function drm_atomic.h (Daniel)
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Cc: Ben Skeggs bskeggs@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 6 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 5 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 6 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 3 ++- include/drm/drm_atomic.h | 11 +++++++++++ 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
...
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_atomic.h b/include/drm/drm_atomic.h index 8cc7ca2..43db162 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_atomic.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_atomic.h @@ -419,5 +419,16 @@ drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(const struct drm_crtc_state *state) state->connectors_changed; } +/* drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset - check if the driver implements
Shouldn't this be
/** * drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset - ...
so it is included in the generated documentation?
Ander
- atomic_commit()
- @dev: DRM device
- This check is useful if drivers do not have DRIVER_ATOMIC set but
- have atomic modesetting internally implemented.
- */
+static inline bool drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(struct drm_device *dev) +{
- return dev->mode_config.funcs->atomic_commit ? true : false;
+} #endif /* DRM_ATOMIC_H_ */