Hi
Am 07.02.20 um 14:59 schrieb Ville Syrjala:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
The docs say possible_clones should always include the encoder itself. Since most drivers don't want to deal with the complexities of cloning let's allow them to set possible_clones=0 and instead we'll fix that up in the core.
We can't put this special case into drm_encoder_init() because drivers will have to fill up possible_clones after adding all the relevant encoders. Otherwise they wouldn't know the proper encoder indexes to use. So we'll just do it just before registering the encoders.
TODO: Should we do something similar for possible_crtcs==0?
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
May this fixup function should warn iff possible_clones was set to non-0 by the driver, but the encoder itself is missing. In any case
Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c index e555281f43d4..f761d9306028 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c @@ -66,11 +66,26 @@ static const struct drm_prop_enum_list drm_encoder_enum_list[] = { { DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DPI, "DPI" }, };
+/*
- For some reason we want the encoder itself included in
- possible_clones. Make life easy for drivers by allowing them
- to leave possible_clones unset if no cloning is possible.
- */
+static void fixup_possible_clones(struct drm_device *dev) +{
- struct drm_encoder *encoder;
- drm_for_each_encoder(encoder, dev)
encoder->possible_clones |= drm_encoder_mask(encoder);+}
int drm_encoder_register_all(struct drm_device *dev) { struct drm_encoder *encoder; int ret = 0;
- fixup_possible_clones(dev);
- drm_for_each_encoder(encoder, dev) { if (encoder->funcs->late_register) ret = encoder->funcs->late_register(encoder);