On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 03:54:11PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
Iterating DisplayID blocks across sections (in EDID extensions) is unnecessarily complicated for the caller. Implement DisplayID iterators to go through all blocks in all sections.
Usage example:
const struct displayid_block *block; struct displayid_iter iter;
displayid_iter_edid_begin(edid, &iter); displayid_iter_for_each(block, &iter) { /* operate on block */ } displayid_iter_end(&iter);
When DisplayID is stored in EDID extensions, the DisplayID sections map to extensions as described in VESA DisplayID v1.3 Appendix B: DisplayID as an EDID Extension. This is implemented here.
When DisplayID is stored in its dedicated DDC device 0xA4, according to VESA E-DDC v1.3, different rules apply for the structure. This is not implemented here, as we don't currently use it, but the idea is you'd have a different call for beginning the iteration, for example simply:
displayid_iter_begin(displayid, &iter);
instead of displayid_iter_edid_begin(), and everything else would be hidden away in the iterator functions.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_displayid.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/drm/drm_displayid.h | 18 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_displayid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_displayid.c index 908bbe6feb61..88070267aac9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_displayid.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_displayid.c @@ -57,3 +57,77 @@ const u8 *drm_find_displayid_extension(const struct edid *edid,
return displayid; }
+void displayid_iter_edid_begin(const struct edid *edid,
struct displayid_iter *iter)
+{
- memset(iter, 0, sizeof(*iter));
- iter->edid = edid;
+}
+static const struct displayid_block * +__displayid_iter_block(const struct displayid_iter *iter) +{
- const struct displayid_block *block;
- if (!iter->section)
return NULL;
- block = (const struct displayid_block *)&iter->section[iter->idx];
- if (iter->idx + sizeof(struct displayid_block) <= iter->length &&
iter->idx + sizeof(struct displayid_block) + block->num_bytes <= iter->length &&
sizeof(*block) perhaps
block->num_bytes > 0)
return block;
- return NULL;
+}
+const struct displayid_block * +__displayid_iter_next(struct displayid_iter *iter) +{
- const struct displayid_block *block;
- if (!iter->edid)
return NULL;
- if (iter->section) {
/* current block should always be valid */
block = __displayid_iter_block(iter);
if (WARN_ON(!block)) {
iter->section = NULL;
iter->edid = NULL;
return NULL;
}
/* next block in section */
iter->idx += sizeof(struct displayid_block) + block->num_bytes;
ditto
Looks like this should do the same thing the current thing does, or at least I couldn't immediately spot nay differences.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
block = __displayid_iter_block(iter);
if (block)
return block;
- }
- for (;;) {
iter->section = drm_find_displayid_extension(iter->edid,
&iter->length,
&iter->idx,
&iter->ext_index);
if (!iter->section) {
iter->edid = NULL;
return NULL;
}
iter->idx += sizeof(struct displayid_hdr);
block = __displayid_iter_block(iter);
if (block)
return block;
- }
+}
+void displayid_iter_end(struct displayid_iter *iter) +{
- memset(iter, 0, sizeof(*iter));
+} diff --git a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h index 3c6db22a518a..27e06c98db17 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h @@ -108,4 +108,22 @@ const u8 *drm_find_displayid_extension(const struct edid *edid, int *length, int *idx, int *ext_index);
+/* DisplayID iteration */ +struct displayid_iter {
- const struct edid *edid;
- const u8 *section;
- int length;
- int idx;
- int ext_index;
+};
+void displayid_iter_edid_begin(const struct edid *edid,
struct displayid_iter *iter);
+const struct displayid_block * +__displayid_iter_next(struct displayid_iter *iter); +#define displayid_iter_for_each(__block, __iter) \
- while (((__block) = __displayid_iter_next(__iter)))
+void displayid_iter_end(struct displayid_iter *iter);
#endif
2.20.1
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel