On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:10:57AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 5:17 AM Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech wrote:
I'm sorry, but I find that situation to be a bit ridiculous.
Honestly, the original report about the pulseaudio problem came in over two weeks ago, and all you seemed to do was to ignore everything that Sudip said and reported.
THAT is the ridiculous part.
The rules for the kernel are very clear: regressions get fixed or they get reverted. And I saw absolutely _zero_ indication that you took that pulseaudio oops at all seriously.
I wasn't questioning the revert itself though, I can see how you took that decision for the audio patch.
What I was interested in was more about the context itself, and I'd still like an answer on whether it's ok to wait for a review for 5 months though, or if it's an expectation from now on that we are supposed to fix bugs over the week-end.
Maxime