Am Freitag, den 04.12.2015, 17:13 +0000 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:08:47PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach l.stach@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Russell King rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk
Although, I would like to be copied on patches, I don't think we have a way to encode that information in MAINTAINERS.
From the top of the MAINTAINERS file:
Descriptions of section entries:
P: Person (obsolete) M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@domain> R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@domain> These reviewers should be CCed on patches.So I guess that'd mean you want to be a reviewer?
Oh, that got agreed upon? I thought there was pushback against that idea.
There was pushback to change random people in MAINTAINERS from maintainer to reviewer just because they don't manage a git tree on their own. The reviewer tag itself was agreed upon.
If you want to be CC'ed on patches we should definitely add you as a reviewer.