On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:26:31AM -0600, Alex Sierra wrote:
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static void print_bad_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
- PFNMAP mappings in order to support COWable mappings.
*/ -struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, +struct page *vm_normal_any_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t pte) { unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(pte); @@ -620,8 +620,6 @@ struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, return NULL; if (is_zero_pfn(pfn)) return NULL;
if (pte_devmap(pte))
return NULL;
print_bad_pte(vma, addr, pte, NULL); return NULL;
... what?
Haven't you just made it so that a devmap page always prints a bad PTE message, and then returns NULL anyway?
Surely this should be:
if (pte_devmap(pte)) - return NULL; + return pfn_to_page(pfn);
or maybe
+ goto check_pfn;
But I don't know about that highest_memmap_pfn check.
@@ -661,6 +659,22 @@ struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, return pfn_to_page(pfn); }
+/*
- vm_normal_lru_page -- This function gets the "struct page" associated
- with a pte only for page cache and anon page. These pages are LRU handled.
- */
+struct page *vm_normal_lru_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
pte_t pte)
It seems a shame to add a new function without proper kernel-doc.