On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones lee.jones@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger sroland@vmware.com > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what > happened here.
Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a reason.
Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back out of a previous one.
They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next merge window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure they don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so patches show up, and then get pulled again.
Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to some confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again (they are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that).
Sorry for the confusion here.
Oh, I see. Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be happy.
Thanks for the explanation Daniel
After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained. Would someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order please?
It's still broken somehow. I've kiced Maxime and Maarten again, they're also on this thread.
You're patches have made it into drm-next meanwhile, so they should show up in linux-next through that tree at least. Except if that one also has some trouble.
Thanks for letting me know.
I see some patches made it back in, others didn't.
I'll resend the stragglers - bear with.