On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Thierry Reding thierry.reding@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Ajay kumar ajaynumb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
[...]
Hm, if you do this can you pls also update drm_panel accordingly? It shouldn't be a lot of fuzz and would make things around drm+dt more consistent.
Are you talking about using struct device_node instead of struct device? I guess you have misplaced the comment under the wrong section!
Yeah, that should have been one up ;-)
Like I said earlier, I don't think dropping struct device * in favour of struct device_node * is a good idea.
I am not sure about drm_panel. But, I am not really doing anything with the struct device pointer in case of bridge. So, just wondering if it is really needed?
Ajay