On 29 March 2018 at 12:17, Laszlo Ersek lersek@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/28/18 16:35, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 28 March 2018 at 11:27, Laszlo Ersek lersek@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/28/18 03:24, Emil Velikov wrote:
Gents, can someone double-check this please? Just in case.
I guess I should test whether this series regresses the use case described in c2cbc38b97; is that correct?
Precisely.
[3] https://github.com/evelikov/linux/commits/ioctl-cleanups
Unfortunately, this series seems to reintroduce the regression fixed / described earlier in commit c2cbc38b97.
Thank you very much for testing.
Believe I've tracked it down to a broken commit from 2014 ;-) Please try the following branch [1] - it's untested, but I'm 99% sure it will work like a charm. If it doesn't please share the dmesg of a) the updated branch, and b) baseline + the debug patch [2]
Thanks again! Emil
[1] https://github.com/evelikov/linux/commits/ioctl-cleanups-v2 [2] https://github.com/evelikov/linux/commit/c2bc545d677001ffe5387aebb708d1adeb1...