On Monday, 2018-07-09 10:36:42 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Avoids the inverted condition compared to the open coded version.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 882a9b9e34bc..f2028c229b96 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -649,9 +649,7 @@ static inline void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
#define cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) \ for (pos = table; pos->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; pos++) \
if (pos->frequency == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID) \continue; \else
for_each_if (pos->frequency != CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)/*
- cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry_idx - iterate with index over a cpufreq
@@ -663,9 +661,7 @@ static inline void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
#define cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry_idx(pos, table, idx) \ cpufreq_for_each_entry_idx(pos, table, idx) \
if (pos->frequency == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID) \continue; \else
for_each_if (pos->frequency == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)
Should be `!=` there ^
int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
2.18.0
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel