On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 6:15 PM Colin King colin.king@canonical.com wrote:
From: Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com
The variable ret is being initialized with a value that is never read and it is being updated later with a new value. The initialization is redundant and can be removed.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com
Applied. thanks!
Alex
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c index 8148a7883de4..346315b3eebe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c @@ -5899,7 +5899,7 @@ static int si_patch_single_dependency_table_based_on_leakage(struct radeon_devic
static int si_patch_dependency_tables_based_on_leakage(struct radeon_device *rdev) {
int ret = 0;
int ret; ret = si_patch_single_dependency_table_based_on_leakage(rdev, &rdev->pm.dpm.dyn_state.vddc_dependency_on_sclk);-- 2.24.0
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel