17 Aug
2012
17 Aug
'12
5:03 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:56:31PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
I guess we could leave it as is for now for -fixes and then switch it use use the new exported symbol for -next? Is it ok to export a new symbol for -fixes?
I don't see why not, providing the ACPI people are happy with it.
So, er, I had no clue how to clean up the return value of acpi_get_table
- does this actually need to be cleaned up? Or do you just get a
pointer straight to the "real" ACPI table?
Not sure on that. Anyone know more about the acpi code?
Not sure what you're asking here - acpi_get_table returns acpi_status, not a pointer.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org