On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:30 PM Aurabindo Pillai mail@aurabindo.in wrote:
Execution will only reach here if the asserted condition is true. Hence there is no need for the additional check.
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai mail@aurabindo.in
Applied. Thanks!
Alex
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c index 60591dbc2..9fedfa531 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c @@ -179,12 +179,10 @@ int amdgpu_driver_load_kms(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) /* Call ACPI methods: require modeset init * but failure is not fatal */
if (!r) {acpi_status = amdgpu_acpi_init(adev);if (acpi_status)dev_dbg(&dev->pdev->dev,"Error during ACPI methods call\n");}
acpi_status = amdgpu_acpi_init(adev);if (acpi_status)dev_dbg(&dev->pdev->dev, "Error during ACPI methods call\n"); if (adev->runpm) { dev_pm_set_driver_flags(dev->dev, DPM_FLAG_NEVER_SKIP);-- 2.26.0
amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx