Hello Thomas,
On 5/2/22 12:35, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Javier
Am 02.05.22 um 10:48 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
Hello,
This series contain patches suggested by Thomas Zimmermannas a feedback for
Ups, I missed a space here. I meant to write "Zimmermann as a feedback..."
"[RFC PATCH v4 00/11] Fix some race between sysfb device registration and drivers probe" [0].
Since other changes in [0] were more controversial, I decided to just split this part in a new patch-set and revisit the rest of the patches later.
Patch #1 is just a cleanup since when working on this noticed that some DRM drivers were passing as preferred bits per pixel to drm_fbdev_generic_setup() the value that is the default anyways.
Patch #2 renames the 'preferred_bpp' drm_fbdev_generic_setup() parameter to 'options', and make this a multi field parameter so that it can be extended later to pass other options as well.
Patch #3 finally adds the new DRM_FB_FW option and makes simpledrm to use it so that the registered framebuffer device is also marked as firmware provided.
For the whole patchset:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de
Thanks a lot!
Thanks for the prompt review!