On 30 March 2016 at 14:53, Ilia Mirkin imirkin@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch wrote:
virtual is a protected keyword in C++ and can't be used at all. Ugh.
This aligns the kernel versions of the drm headers with the ones in libdrm.
Cc: Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com
include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h index a0ebfe7c9a28..d299c7749091 100644 --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h @@ -373,7 +373,11 @@ struct drm_buf_pub { */ struct drm_buf_map { int count; /**< Length of the buffer list */ +#ifdef __cplusplus
void *virt;Shouldn't this also be __user for consistency? (I realize it'll never play since the kernel doesn't get built with C++...)
Yes please. There is also a bunch of extern C guards that could be nice, but that's a whole another thing.
-Emil