22 Jul
2016
22 Jul
'16
1:23 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
I believe you're thinking of: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/77191/ https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/77192/
Although they don't test for multiple rotation values...
I guess you could just
for (rotation = 0; rotation < 0x40; rotation++) if (!is_power_of_2(rotation & 0xf) || (rotation & ~supported) != 0) // expect failure }
if you want to be really sure invalid crap won't get through.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC