Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking.
On 03.12.21 12:20, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Sorry for the late reply.
On 11/21/21 12:47, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking.
On 16.11.21 05:52, Harald Dunkel wrote:
if I enable CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB in 5.15.2 and use grub's default configuration (Debian sid amd64), then a few lines at the bottom of /dev/tty1 including login prompt are off-screen. Scrolling is broken. I can login, though.
Enabling GRUB_TERMINAL=console in grub doesn't make a difference. Using the same kernel except for CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB the problem is gone.
Graphics card is a GeForce GTX 1650. I tried with both CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU and proprietary graphics drivers disabled.
Attached you can find the config file. Please mail if I can help to track this problem down.
Thx for the report. I'm not totally sure if this is a regression, as that's a new config option. But it might be one considered a successor to an older one, hence it might count as regression. Adding two developers and a mailing list to the CC, hopefully someone can clarify.
I don't think this is a regression since enabling CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB will make the simpledrm driver to be bound while disabling the option makes the efifb driver to be bound instead. Yes, it seems to be a bug in the simpledrm driver but the solution if you have issues with the simpledrm is to not enable CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB and keep using the old fbdev driver.
Mandy thx for the answer, Javier. Harald is quiet for some time already and didn't object so far, hence I'll remove this from regzbot:
#regzbot invalid: problem caused by a new CONFIG option
Ciao, Thorsten
P.S.: As a Linux kernel regression tracker I'm getting a lot of reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them. Unfortunately therefore I sometimes will get things wrong or miss something important. I hope that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me about it in a public reply. That's in everyone's interest, as what I wrote above might be misleading to everyone reading this; any suggestion I gave they thus might sent someone reading this down the wrong rabbit hole, which none of us wants.
BTW, I have no personal interest in this issue, which is tracked using regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot (https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/). I'm only posting this mail to get things rolling again and hence don't need to be CC on all further activities wrt to this regression.