1 Dec
2017
1 Dec
'17
5:57 p.m.
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-12-01 17:55:15)
Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:48:17)
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
The current wait_for() is a little more complicated nowadays (variable W).
Hmm, am I based off the wrong tree? I'm using drm-intel-next.
drm-intel-next is what was sent as a PR; drm-intel-next-queued is always current. To be sure CI, doesn't complain about merge conflicts, base on drm-tip.
Speaking of CI, do you have any instructions on how we might set up a test system? Just needs a compatible monitor and some test code? Could chamelium or something like that be used as a validator? -Chris