On 2018-01-10 01:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 07:14:41PM +0000, Deposite Pirate wrote:
December 22, 2017 4:35 PM, "Michel Dänzer" michel@daenzer.net wrote:
"Deposite Pirate", do the attached (only compile tested) patches work?
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. I was not at home for a while. So, I've compiled and booted a kernel with both of these patches and the issue is still present.
Below a revised version of Michel's first patch. This one should work I hope. -Daniel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c index d22f4b6a8828..dc0abdf8be00 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c @@ -213,9 +213,6 @@ void radeon_crtc_load_lut(struct drm_crtc *crtc) struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
- if (!crtc->enabled)
return;- if (ASIC_IS_DCE5(rdev)) dce5_crtc_load_lut(crtc); else if (ASIC_IS_DCE4(rdev))
Good catch, thanks Daniel. FWIW though, I'd prefer this to be a separate patch, in case it causes any regressions. But let's wait for test results first.