It looks like this structure isn't being used at all. So I'm OK with this change, in case we ever use it in the future.
Regards, Felix
Am 2022-02-18 um 02:47 schrieb Christian König:
Felix need to comment as well, but I don't think that this will work that easily.
By changing the entry from 1 to 0 your are also changing the size of the structure.
Regards, Christian.
Am 18.02.22 um 04:09 schrieb cgel.zte@gmail.com:
From: Changcheng Deng deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use "flexible array members" for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used. Reference: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-a...
Reported-by: Zeal Robot zealci@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Changcheng Deng deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h index 482ba84a728d..d7c38fbc533e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ struct cdit_header { uint32_t creator_revision; uint32_t total_entries; uint16_t num_domains; - uint8_t entry[1]; + uint8_t entry[]; }; #pragma pack()