Thanks Jonathan!
On 12 December 2016 at 01:14, Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:35:42 +0100 Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch wrote:
Here's a thought, though: how about if we slip in a little version of dma-buf.rst now with a "coming soon, don't miss it!!" message? Then the rest of the set could go through your tree without touching driver-api/index.rst and, thus, avoiding the otherwise inevitable conflicts?
So just patch 1 still for 4.10 through your tree? Sounds good to me.
Yeah, that will work just fine, I'll slip it in.
Pushed the rest of the patches in drm-misc-next, queued for 4.11.
Thanks,
jon
Best, Sumit.