On 14 May 2015 at 07:17, Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com
xf86drm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c index f7c45f8..5e7306e 100644 --- a/xf86drm.c +++ b/xf86drm.c @@ -635,9 +635,8 @@ static int drmOpenByName(const char *name, int type) drmFreeVersion(version); id = drmGetBusid(fd); drmMsg("drmGetBusid returned '%s'\n", id ? id : "NULL");
if (!id || !*id) {
if (id)
drmFreeBusid(id);
if (id && *id) {
drmFreeBusid(id);
I believe that it's correct as is, at least according to the comment just before the loop. What makes you think that it's a typo ? Admittedly this function is not too pretty, but most of that is due to it originating from the UMS era.
-Emil