On 04/04/2017 11:53 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
This is going to be a bit too much, but good to have at least a small note about where this should all head towards.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com
include/drm/drm_drv.h | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h index 9fe6301edd6a..0a367cf5d8d5 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h @@ -274,6 +274,11 @@ struct drm_driver { * constant but unknown small number of scanlines wrt. real scanout * position. *
* FIXME:
*
* Since this is a helper to implement @get_vblank_timestamp, we should
* move it to &struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs, like all the other
*/ int (*get_scanout_position) (struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe, unsigned int flags, int *vpos, int *hpos,* helper-internal hooks.
@@ -317,6 +322,11 @@ struct drm_driver { * * True on success, false on failure, which means the core should * fallback to a simple timestamp taken in drm_crtc_handle_vblank().
*
* FIXME:
*
* We should move this hook to &struct drm_crtc_funcs like all the other
*/ bool (*get_vblank_timestamp) (struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe, int *max_error,* vblank hooks.
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong narmstrong@baylibre.com