On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Martin Peres martin.peres@free.fr wrote:
On 20/05/15 08:11, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Maarten Lankhorst maarten@mblankhorst.nl wrote:
Op 15-05-15 om 09:11 schreef Alexandre Courbot:
Re-pinging Marteen on an email address that still exists :P
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnurou@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Alexandre Courbot acourbot@nvidia.com wrote:
On 03/14/2015 04:33 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Hey, > > Op 13-03-15 om 07:27 schreef Alexandre Courbot: >> >> Add a flag allowing Nouveau to specify that an object should be >> coherent >> at allocation time. This is required for some class of objects like >> fences which are randomly-accessed by both the CPU and GPU. This >> flag >> instructs the kernel driver to make sure the object remains coherent >> even on architectures for which coherency is not guaranteed by the >> bus. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot acourbot@nvidia.com > > I don't see a problem with this patch, but similar patches to intel > to > libdrm have been shot down when the changes weren't in an official > kernel > yet, so I think this should wait until the change is at least in > drm-next. > ;-)
Sounds good. I will ping you again once the kernel change reaches -next.
Hi Marteen,
The kernel change required for this patch is now in -next. Do you think we can merge it now?
I think it would be ok to merge now.
Great - who could do this? :P
I could do it. Please provide me with the patch with the necessary R-b and I can push it to our libdrm (and/or mesa).
Thanks, I just sent a v2 with you included. I have yet to receive formal R-b and A-b for it though.