On Thursday 18 April 2013 17:06:57 Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:43:23PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 April 2013 22:18:01 ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
tests/modetest/buffers.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/modetest/buffers.c b/tests/modetest/buffers.c index 5086381..6b117b4 100644 --- a/tests/modetest/buffers.c +++ b/tests/modetest/buffers.c @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ fill_smpte(const struct format_info *info, void *planes[3], unsigned int width, #define BLUE 0
static void
-make_pwetty(void *data, int width, int height, int stride) +make_pwetty(void *data, int width, int height, int stride, int rgb16)
What about passing the format 4cc instead ?
It's a bit more work since I need to pass the whole format_info down from fill_tiles(). But I can make a v2 with that change.
It was just an idea to make the code more future-proof, in case we decide to make 24-bit formats pwetty at some point. Maybe a bpp value would be a good compromise ?