On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:56:06AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 11:39 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:08:32PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 04.03.20 um 13:07 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
Commit 52791eeec1d9 ("dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv") renamed include/linux/reservation.h to include/linux/dma-resv.h, but missed the reference in the MAINTAINERS entry.
Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains:
warning: no file matches F: include/linux/reservation.h
Adjust the DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK entry in MAINTAINERS.
Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda sebastian.duda@fau.de Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda sebastian.duda@fau.de Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
You'll push this too? -Daniel
Christian, please pick this patch. applies cleanly on current master and next-20200303
MAINTAINERS | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 6158a143a13e..3d6cb2789c9e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5022,7 +5022,7 @@ L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org L: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org (moderated for non-subscribers) F: drivers/dma-buf/ F: include/linux/dma-buf* -F: include/linux/reservation.h +F: include/linux/dma-resv.h F: include/linux/*fence.h F: Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst K: dma_(buf|fence|resv)
Slightly unrelated:
The K: entry matches a lot of other things and may have a lot of false positive matches like any variable named dma_buffer
This should also use (?:...) to avoid a perl capture group.
Perhaps:
K: '\bdma_(?:buf|fence|resv)\b'
Hm either people aren't using get_maintainers.pl consistently, or it doesn't seem to be a real world problem. I'm not seeing any unrelated patches on dri-devel at least.
But happy to merge such a patch if it shows up ofc, it's definitely the more correct thing :-) -Daniel