Hi Alex,
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:01:00AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:30 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:52:25PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
[AMD Public Use]
-----Original Message----- From: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 9:15 PM To: Koenig, Christian Christian.Koenig@amd.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch; Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com; dri- devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Dave Airlie airlied@gmail.com; Greg Kroah- Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de; Deucher, Alexander Alexander.Deucher@amd.com; Rob Clark robdclark@gmail.com; Sean Paul sean@poorly.run; Ben Skeggs bskeggs@redhat.com; Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com; Thierry Reding thierry.reding@gmail.com; Eric Anholt eric@anholt.net; VMware Graphics linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com; Thomas Hellstrom thellstrom@vmware.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm: uapi: Use SPDX in DRM drivers uAPI headers
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 17.07.20 um 04:27 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:29:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:58:44AM +0200, Christian König wrote: >> Am 21.06.20 um 04:07 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: >>> Most of the DRM drivers uAPI headers are licensed under the MIT >>> license, and carry copies of the license with slight variations. >>> Replace them with SPDX headers. >> My personal opinion is that this is a really good idea, but my >> professional is that we need the acknowledgment from our legal
department for this.
> I think official ack from amd on first patch, especially the .rst > snippet, would be really good indeed. Any update on this one ?
Sorry totally forgot to forward this because I was waiting for split up patches.
Going to do so right now.
Has there been any update ? :-)
AMD legal requires the full license.
Um, what? Please let me talk to them about this, it's not ok for one individual company, out of 450+, to somehow decide to do something different.
Please put your lawyers in contact with me and I will have them discuss it with the proper lawyers on our side.
After more discussion, the lawyers have allowed us to use the SPDX licenses now.
Very nice to hear this, thank you :-)
Could you reply to the corresponding patches in v2 with an Acked-by ?