We checked "ver" and "ramcfg.size" before and they haven't changed so static checkers complain when we test them again here. "rammap.data" isn't be NULL so "ramcfg.data" is also not NULL so there is no need to check.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c index de9f395..e465635 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c @@ -157,10 +157,6 @@ gf100_ram_calc(struct nvkm_fb *pfb, u32 freq) }
ramcfg.data = rammap.data + rammap.size + (strap * ramcfg.size); - if (!ramcfg.data || ver != 0x10 || ramcfg.size < 0x0e) { - nv_error(pfb, "invalid/missing ramcfg entry\n"); - return -EINVAL; - }
/* lookup memory timings, if bios says they're present */ strap = nv_ro08(bios, ramcfg.data + 0x01);