Op 22-04-2021 om 13:00 schreef Mun, Gwan-gyeong:
The changed name looks more accurate to the edp 1.4b spec. Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 15:02 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
DP_PSR_EN_CFG bit 5 aka "Selective Update Region Scan Line Capture Indication" in eDP spec has a ambiguous name, so renaming to better match specification.
While at it, replacing bit shit by BIT() macro and adding the version some registers were added to eDP specification.
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Cc: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza jose.souza@intel.com
include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h index 1e85c2021f2f..d6f6a084a190 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h @@ -687,14 +687,14 @@ struct drm_device; #define DP_DSC_ENABLE 0x160 /* DP 1.4 */ # define DP_DECOMPRESSION_EN (1 << 0) -#define DP_PSR_EN_CFG 0x170 /* XXX 1.2? */ -# define DP_PSR_ENABLE (1 << 0) -# define DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE (1 << 1) -# define DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION (1 << 2) -# define DP_PSR_FRAME_CAPTURE (1 << 3) -# define DP_PSR_SELECTIVE_UPDATE (1 << 4) -# define DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS (1 << 5) -# define DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2 (1 << 6) /* eDP 1.4a */ +#define DP_PSR_EN_CFG 0x170 /* XXX 1.2? */ +# define DP_PSR_ENABLE BIT(0) +# define DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE BIT(1) +# define DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION BIT(2) +# define DP_PSR_FRAME_CAPTURE BIT(3) +# define DP_PSR_SU_REGION_SCANLINE_CAPTURE BIT(4) /* eDP 1.4a */ +# define DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS BIT(5) /* eDP 1.4a */ +# define DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2 BIT(6) /* eDP 1.4a */ #define DP_ADAPTER_CTRL 0x1a0 # define DP_ADAPTER_CTRL_FORCE_LOAD_SENSE (1 << 0)
Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
This should probably go throuh drm-misc-next, I don't see the next patch depending on this?