Yes, that is correct.
Nayan
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 9:05 PM Andrey Grodzovsky Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com wrote:
Clarification question - if the run queues belong to different schedulers they effectively point to different rings,
it means we allow to move (reschedule) a drm_sched_entity from one ring to another - i assume that the idea int the first place, that
you have a set of HW rings and you can utilize any of them for your jobs (like compute rings). Correct ?
Andrey
On 08/01/2018 04:20 AM, Nayan Deshmukh wrote:
The function selects the run queue from the rq_list with the least load. The load is decided by the number of jobs in a scheduler.
v2: avoid using atomic read twice consecutively, instead store it locally
Signed-off-by: Nayan Deshmukh nayan26deshmukh@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c | 25
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
index 375f6f7f6a93..fb4e542660b0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c @@ -255,6 +255,31 @@ static bool drm_sched_entity_is_ready(struct
drm_sched_entity *entity)
return true;}
+/**
- drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched - Get the rq from rq_list with least
load
- @entity: scheduler entity
- Return the pointer to the rq with least load.
- */
+static struct drm_sched_rq * +drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity) +{
struct drm_sched_rq *rq = NULL;unsigned int min_jobs = UINT_MAX, num_jobs;int i;for (i = 0; i < entity->num_rq_list; ++i) {num_jobs =atomic_read(&entity->rq_list[i]->sched->num_jobs);
if (num_jobs < min_jobs) {min_jobs = num_jobs;rq = entity->rq_list[i];}}return rq;+}
- static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb) {