The rc_model_size is specified in the DSC config, and the hardware programming should respect that instead of hard coding a value of 8192.
Regardless, the rc_model_size in DSC config is currently hard coded to the same value, so this should have no impact, other than allowing the use of other sizes as needed.
Cc: Manasi Navare manasi.d.navare@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c index 9e6aaa302e40..484853deb5d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static void intel_dsc_pps_configure(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
/* Populate PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_9 registers */ pps_val = 0; - pps_val |= DSC_RC_MODEL_SIZE(DSC_RC_MODEL_SIZE_CONST) | + pps_val |= DSC_RC_MODEL_SIZE(vdsc_cfg->rc_model_size) | DSC_RC_EDGE_FACTOR(DSC_RC_EDGE_FACTOR_CONST); DRM_INFO("PPS9 = 0x%08x\n", pps_val); if (!is_pipe_dsc(crtc_state)) {