On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 06:21:28PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:27 PM Bjorn Helgaas helgaas@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 06:36:12PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:30 PM Mika Westerberg mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 06:05:14PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
still happens with your patch applied. The machine simply gets shut down.
dmesg can be found here: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/karolherbst/40eb091c7b7b33ef993525de660f1...
Looking your dmesg:
Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB version 4.1 Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: MM: using COPY for buffer copies Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 1
I would assume it runtime suspends here. Then it wakes up because of PCI access from userspace:
Sep 30 17:24:42 kernel: pci_raw_set_power_state: 56 callbacks suppressed
and for some reason it does not get resumed properly. There are also few warnings from ACPI that might be relevant:
Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: _SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: _SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59)
afaik this is the case for essentially every laptop out there.
I think we should look into this a little bit. acpi_ns_check_argument_types() checks the argument type and prints this message, but AFAICT it doesn't actually fix anything or prevent execution of the method, so I have no idea what happens when we actually execute the _DSM.
I can assure you that this warning happens on every single laptop out there with dual Nvidia graphics and it's essentially just a firmware bug. And it never caused any issues on any of the older laptops (or newest one for that matter).
Rafael, do you know anything about this? If ACPI has some sort of workaround so it can execute the method correctly anyway, maybe we should remove or reword the warning?
Or if this does prevent execution of the method, maybe we need to add a workaround since the problem is so prevalent in the field?
If we execute this _DSM as part of power management, and the _DSM doesn't work right, it would be no surprise that we have problems.
Maybe we could learn something by turning on ACPI_DB_PARSE output (see Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst).
You must have an acpidump already from all your investigation. Can you put it somewhere, e.g., bugzilla.kernel.org, and include a URL?
Will do so later, right now I am traveling to XDC and will have more time for that then.