On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 02:45:05PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Return -EINVAL if there's no PLL configuration for the given pixel clock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de
drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c index 482843ebb69f..045a20055515 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int mgag200_g200_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
if (clock > p_clk_max) { drm_err(dev, "Pixel Clock %ld too high\n", clock);
return 1;
return -EINVAL;
}
if (clock < p_clk_min >> 3)
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int mga_g200se_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
if (delta > permitteddelta) { pr_warn("PLL delta too large\n");
return 1;
return -EINVAL;
}
misc = RREG8(MGA_MISC_IN);
The return value is ignored but I assume it makes sense in a later patch. Should mgag200_crtc_set_plls() return -EINVAL if there was no match? Today it returns 0 - which is not an error.
Sam