Hi Kalakodima,
Thank you for the patch.
PAtches 3/8, 4/8 and 5/8 modify the new drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_cmm.c a file that was introduced in 1/8. Please squash them all together, there's no point in adding a driver with known to be incorrect code to then fix it in other patches.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 06:44:39PM +0530, VenkataRajesh.Kalakodima@in.bosch.com wrote:
From: kalakodima venkata rajesh venkatarajesh.kalakodima@in.bosch.com
Replace the hardcoded value of clu table sample count with a meaningful name.
Signed-off-by: Harsha M M harsha.manjulamallikarjun@in.bosch.com
This is the out-of-tree patch for DU CMM driver support from Yocto release v3.6.0. The part of this patch adding CMM support to the new Rcar E3 (R8A77990) SoC was filtered out due to lack of Yocto v3.6.0 (i.e. rcar-3.6.2) kernel updates on staging-414.
Link: https://github.com/renesas-rcar/du_cmm/commit/53973b806881ed8f54500b0d42bdc40aaca60476.patch Following is from the patch description: Subject: [PATCH] du_cmm: Release for Yocto v3.6.0 This patch made the following correspondence. - R-Car E3(R8A77990) device support. - Fix rewritting of parameter procedure in rcar_du_cmm_postcloseSigned-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca erosca@de.adit-jv.com
- Resolved checkpatch errors - Resolved merge conflicts according to latest versionSigned-off-by: kalakodima venkata rajesh venkatarajesh.kalakodima@in.bosch.com
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_cmm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_cmm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_cmm.c index ac613a6e..d380dd9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_cmm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_cmm.c @@ -75,9 +75,9 @@ #include <linux/clk.h>
/* #define DEBUG_PROCE_TIME 1 */
+#define CMM_CLU_SAMPLES 17 #define CMM_LUT_NUM 256 -#define CMM_CLU_NUM (17 * 17 * 17) +#define CMM_CLU_NUM (CMM_CLU_SAMPLES * CMM_CLU_SAMPLES * CMM_CLU_SAMPLES) #define CMM_HGO_NUM 64 /* rcar_du_drm.h Include */ #define LUT_DOUBLE_BUFFER_AUTO 0 @@ -211,11 +211,11 @@ static inline u32 index_to_clu_data(int index) { int r, g, b;
- r = index % 17;
- index /= 17;
- g = index % 17;
- index /= 17;
- b = index % 17;
r = index % CMM_CLU_SAMPLES;
index /= CMM_CLU_SAMPLES;
g = index % CMM_CLU_SAMPLES;
index /= CMM_CLU_SAMPLES;
b = index % CMM_CLU_SAMPLES;
r = (r << 20); if (r > (255 << 16))
@@ -630,9 +630,9 @@ static int clu_table_copy(struct rcar_du_cmm *du_cmm) }
rcar_du_cmm_write(du_cmm, dst_addr, 0);
- for (i = 0; i < 17; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 17; j++) {for (k = 0; k < 17; k++) {
- for (i = 0; i < CMM_CLU_SAMPLES; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < CMM_CLU_SAMPLES; j++) {for (k = 0; k < CMM_CLU_SAMPLES; k++) { rcar_du_cmm_write(du_cmm, src_addr, (k << 16) | (j << 8) | (i << 0));@@ -912,9 +912,9 @@ int rcar_du_cmm_pm_suspend(struct rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc) }
index = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < 17; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 17; j++) {for (k = 0; k < 17; k++) {
- for (i = 0; i < CMM_CLU_SAMPLES; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < CMM_CLU_SAMPLES; j++) {for (k = 0; k < CMM_CLU_SAMPLES; k++) { rcar_du_cmm_write(du_cmm, CMM_CLU_ADDR, (k << 16) | (j << 8) | (i << 0));@@ -1014,6 +1014,8 @@ void rcar_du_cmm_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv) for (crtcs_cnt = 0; crtcs_cnt < rcdu->num_crtcs; crtcs_cnt++) { rcrtc = &rcdu->crtcs[crtcs_cnt]; du_cmm = rcrtc->cmm_handle;
if (!du_cmm)continue;