5 Jan
2012
5 Jan
'12
4:10 p.m.
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:00:52 +0100, Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
If MSLEEP is indeed unused, I think it should just die - we have way too much yelling cruft from dri1 yonder lying around that hides important details like this. Otherwise
It was used, they just happened to all be redundant or mispellings of wait-for-vblank. All the remaining sleeps now look to be away from the atomic paths, and so MSLEEP can die for the time being. -Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre