On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:00:46PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 11-01-17 om 17:13 schreef Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:43PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
If the crtc was brought up with audio before the driver loads, then crtc_disable will remove a refcount to audio that doesn't exist before.
Fortunately we already set power domains on readout, so we can just add the power domain handling to get_crtc_power_domains, which will update the power domains correctly in all cases.
This was found when testing module reload on CI with the crtc enabled, which resulted in the following warn after module reload + modeset:
[ 24.197041] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 24.197075] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 99 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c:1790 intel_display_power_put+0x134/0x140 [i915] [ 24.197076] Use count on domain AUDIO is already zero [ 24.197098] CPU: 0 PID: 99 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 4.9.0-CI-Trybot_393+ #1 [ 24.197099] Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0042.2016.0409.1246 04/09/2016 [ 24.197102] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn [ 24.197105] ffffc900003c7688 ffffffff81435b35 ffffc900003c76d8 0000000000000000 [ 24.197107] ffffc900003c76c8 ffffffff8107e4d6 000006fe5dc36f28 ffff88025dc30054 [ 24.197109] ffff88025dc36f28 ffff88025dc30000 ffff88025dc30000 0000000000000015 [ 24.197110] Call Trace: [ 24.197113] [<ffffffff81435b35>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92 [ 24.197116] [<ffffffff8107e4d6>] __warn+0xc6/0xe0 [ 24.197118] [<ffffffff8107e53a>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50 [ 24.197149] [<ffffffffa039b4b4>] intel_display_power_put+0x134/0x140 [i915] [ 24.197187] [<ffffffffa04217dd>] intel_disable_ddi+0x4d/0x80 [i915] [ 24.197223] [<ffffffffa03f388f>] intel_encoders_disable.isra.74+0x7f/0x90 [i915] [ 24.197257] [<ffffffffa03f6c05>] haswell_crtc_disable+0x55/0x170 [i915] [ 24.197292] [<ffffffffa03fec88>] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x108/0xfd0 [i915] [ 24.197295] [<ffffffff810d47c6>] ? __lock_is_held+0x66/0x90 [ 24.197330] [<ffffffffa03fff79>] intel_atomic_commit+0x429/0x560 [i915] [ 24.197332] [<ffffffff81570186>] ?drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors+0x56/0xf0 [ 24.197334] [<ffffffff8156f726>] drm_atomic_commit+0x46/0x50 [ 24.197336] [<ffffffff81553f87>] restore_fbdev_mode+0x147/0x270 [ 24.197337] [<ffffffff81555bee>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2e/0x70 [ 24.197339] [<ffffffff81555aa8>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x28/0x50 [ 24.197374] [<ffffffffa041c7d3>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x13/0x70 [i915] [ 24.197376] [<ffffffff8149e07a>] fbcon_init+0x57a/0x600 [ 24.197379] [<ffffffff81514b71>] visual_init+0xd1/0x130 [ 24.197381] [<ffffffff8151603c>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1bc/0x3a0 [ 24.197384] [<ffffffff81516521>] do_take_over_console+0x111/0x180 [ 24.197386] [<ffffffff8149e152>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x52/0xb0 [ 24.197387] [<ffffffff814a12c3>] fbcon_event_notify+0x723/0x850 [ 24.197390] [<ffffffff810a4830>] ?__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x30/0x70 [ 24.197392] [<ffffffff810a44a4>] notifier_call_chain+0x34/0xa0 [ 24.197394] [<ffffffff810a4848>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x70 [ 24.197397] [<ffffffff810a4881>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20 [ 24.197398] [<ffffffff814a4556>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [ 24.197400] [<ffffffff814a678c>] register_framebuffer+0x24c/0x330 [ 24.197402] [<ffffffff815558d9>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x219/0x3c0 [ 24.197436] [<ffffffffa041d373>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x13/0x30 [i915] [ 24.197438] [<ffffffff810a5d44>] async_run_entry_fn+0x34/0x140 [ 24.197440] [<ffffffff8109c26c>] process_one_work+0x1ec/0x6b0 [ 24.197442] [<ffffffff8109c1e6>] ? process_one_work+0x166/0x6b0 [ 24.197445] [<ffffffff8109c779>] worker_thread+0x49/0x490 [ 24.197447] [<ffffffff8109c730>] ? process_one_work+0x6b0/0x6b0 [ 24.197448] [<ffffffff810a2a9b>] kthread+0xeb/0x110 [ 24.197451] [<ffffffff810a29b0>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 [ 24.197453] [<ffffffff818241a7>] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 [ 24.197476] ---[ end trace bda64b683b8e8162 ]---
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Do we still need this with patch 3? I know it'd be nice if we could faithfully restore any state we can also program, but then that's also a lot of complexity ...
Otoh patch 3 means we'll stop testing a lot of the fastboot code while reloading the driver. But then that's been the thing in the past, and as long as we still boot up we have at least some test coverage fo the fastboot code (I'm mostly concerned about the plane/buffer readout code, since that's not covered by the state checker).
But for now I'd say let's just go with patch 3 only.
We don't need this patch, but it makes the audio power domain tracked like all other power domains. It's a nice cleanup in general and I would like it even without the rest of the series. Could otherwise be merged through the intel tree through.
Hm, count me convinced.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch