On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 18:09, Kuogee Hsieh quic_khsieh@quicinc.com wrote:
On 5/19/2022 5:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-05-19 16:11:40)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c index cacd32f..78b7306 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c @@ -87,14 +87,19 @@ struct qcom_edp {
struct clk_bulk_data clks[2]; struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
int enable_load[2];
};
static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy) { struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); int ret;
int i;
ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies), edp->supplies);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
Use ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies)?
regulator_set_load(edp->supplies[i].consumer, edp->enable_load[i]);
ret = regulator_bulk_enable(2, edp->supplies);
Why is ARRAY_SIZE() usage removed?
remove it base on Dmitry's comment.
Ugh. I asked to remove the num_consumers variable, not the ARRAY_SIZE.
I will restore it back to use ARRY_SIZE
if (ret) return ret;